CRISPR-Cas9 is widely used to edit the genome by studying genes of interest and modifying disease-associated genes. However, this process is associated with side effects including unwanted mutations and toxicity. Therefore, a new technology that reduces these side effects is needed to improve its usefulness in industry and medicine. Now, researchers at Kyushu University in southern Japan and Nagoya University School of Medicine in central Japan have developed an optimized genome-editing method that vastly reduces mutations, opening the door to more effective treatment of genetic diseases with fewer unwanted mutations. Their findings were published in Nature Biomedical Engineering.
Genome-editing technology centered on CRISPR-Cas9 has revolutionized the food and medicine industries. In the technology, Cas9 nuclease, an enzyme that cuts DNA, is introduced into the cell with a synthetic guide RNA (gRNA) that guides the enzyme to the required location. By cutting the genome, unwanted genes can be deleted, and new (functional) genes can be added in easily and quickly.
One of the drawbacks of genome editing is that there are growing concerns about mutations and off-target effects. This is often caused by the enzyme targeting genomic sites that have a sequence similar to the target site. Similarly, mutations at the chromosome level can occur when genes are altered, which has hindered clinical trials of gene therapy for cancer and even resulted in the deaths of patients undergoing treatment for muscular dystrophy. The group hypothesized that current editing protocols that use Cas9 cause excessive DNA cleavage, resulting in some of the mutations.
To test this hypothesis, a group consisting of Assistant Professor Masaki Kawamata at Kyushu University and Professor Hiroshi Suzuki at the Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine constructed a system called “AIMS” in mouse cells, which evaluated the activity of Cas9 separately for each chromosome. Their results showed that the commonly used method was associated with very high editing activity. They determined that this high activity was causing some of the unwanted side effects, so they searched for gRNA modification methods that could suppress it. They found that an extra cytosine extension to the 5′ end of the gRNA was effective as a “safeguard” for the overactivity and allowed control over DNA cleavage. They called this fine-tuning system ‘safeguard gRNA’ ([C]gRNA).”
Their results were striking. Using their new technique, off-target effects and cytotoxicity were reduced, the efficiency of single-allele selective editing was increased, and the efficiency of homology-directed repair, the most commonly employed mechanism for DNA double-strand break repair, was enhanced.
To test its effectiveness in a medical setting, they investigated a rare disease called fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Using a mouse model, they were able to create the same genotype as the human version of the disease. Then, using patient-derived iPS cells, they were able to precisely repair damage down to a single nucleotide specifically in the disease-associated allele causing the disease, demonstrating their technique’s usefulness as a safe and efficient gene therapy method.
The team also constructed the first mathematical model of the correlation between various genome-editing patterns and Cas9 activity, which would enable the user to simulate the results of genome editing in an entire cell population. This breakthrough would allow researchers to determine the Cas9 activity that maximizes efficiency, reducing the enormous costs and labor required.
The group is now working on a start-up business plan to spread the new genome editing platform. “In particular, we believe that this technology can make a significant contribution to the medical field,” said Dr. Kawamata. “We are currently evaluating its therapeutic efficacy and safety for selected target diseases in cell and animal experiments and using it to help develop therapeutic drugs and gene therapy methods, especially for rare diseases for which no treatment methods have yet been established.”
